Purchase mobileappIcon Download our Mobile App
Call Us at 011-40705070   or  
Click to Call
Select your Board & Class
  • Select Board
  • Select Class

 debate in favour of criminals are wicked and deserve punishment

Asked by abhayj97...(student) , on 3/12/11

Answers

badges

 Debate:

When I am walking suddenly someone comes and asks me for money pointing a Gun at me, I say 'please I don 't have any ', that Idiut shoots me in the Leg and runs away. 

After 2 weeks in Hospital, I fear walking on the roads alone, actually I will never walk again on roads alone. 

This person is a Criminal! 'Criminal ' is a person who commits some crime without thinking what consequences may be faced by one who is victim of a Crime.

Should a person like that be Spared? What is the punishment for causing so much suffering to me? Yes, My Friends I am talking for the motion 'Criminals are wicked and should be punished ' 

A wrong done under any circumstances is a wrong. A poor person who wants to give food to his son will commit robbery or murder, If this poor man murders a young man just for money should he be left away? Who has given him right to harm others because he is in need? Would it not be better if a poor person just eat something from a Garbage can?

(remaining you fill)

Posted by Akshita Viswan(student)on 3/12/11

badges

Arguments in favour of the motion:
a) Criminals deserve punishment as they are wicked. If they are not punished they will continue committing crime which will destabilize the society. Appropriate punishment will act as deterrent for the criminals to take to the path of crime.
b) If criminals are not punished for their crimes it will be an injustice to the victims.
c) Criminals deserve punishment as they cannot be reformed without being punished.

d) Since the doer of good work is rewarded with appreciation then it follows that evil doer like criminals is awarded with punishment.

e) If criminals are not punished people will not differentiate between criminal and non-criminal activities.

 

Posted by Happy Singh(student)on 16/11/12

badges

  Arguments in favour of the motion: 

a) Criminals deserve punishment as they are wicked. If they are not punished they will continue committing crime which will destabilize the society. Appropriate punishment will act as deterrent for the criminals to take to the path of crime. 
b) If criminals are not punished for their crimes it will be an injustice to the victims. 
c) Criminals deserve punishment as they cannot be reformed without being punished.

d) Since the doer of good work is rewarded with appreciation then it follows that evil doer like criminals is awarded with punishment.

e) If criminals are not punished people will not differentiate between criminal and non-criminal activities.

Posted by Nehla Hanan(student)on 29/12/12

badges

Arguments in favour of the motion:

a) criminals are like wild beast knowing no mercy.
b)have no chance of reformation even if given opportunities.
c)deserve severest punishment to teach others against repetition of such nonhuman crimes.
d)severest physical punishments given to them in gulf countries support this view.

Arguments in  against the motion:
a)taking ones life is unpardonable as one cannot give one life.
b) various avenues for reformation may be used.
c) love pardon mercy pity greatest human virtues to change the heart even of a hardcore criminal.
d)such examples in plenty in history.
e)crime to be hated not the criminals.  

hope it satisfy you

Posted by Nehla Hanan(student)on 1/1/13

badges

criminals are wicked and should be punished otherwise they will keep on taking lives of the innocent. They are not humans and dont deserve to live in the world.

Posted by Ram Singh(student)on 17/12/13

Ask a QuestionHave a doubt? Ask our expert and get quick answers.
Show me more questions

close