Aram justified the stealing of horse as fulfilling the passion.
Is he considered to be Mourad's partner in crime. 
Express your views.

Dear Student,
Aram was not angry with Mourad when he found him with the beautiful horse. Aram knew that it was against their tribe's culture. But somehow he reconciled and tried to justify the act of stealing a horse as not as serious and punishable as stealing money. The two brothers didn't commit a serious crime because their intention was just to fulfill their wish to ride that horse and then return it. So in this context, their innocence has surpassed their act of stealing, which can't be blamed. 


Hope this helps.

Regards

  • 0
Because aram and maurad both together stealed the horse .and mourad was having fond to ride horse so aram has helped hos friend to fulfill his dream
  • 0
What are you looking for?