debate in favour of c riminals are wicked and deserve punishment

 Debate:

When I am walking suddenly someone comes and asks me for money pointing a Gun at me, I say 'please I don't have any', that Idiut shoots me in the Leg and runs away. 

After 2 weeks in Hospital, I fear walking on the roads alone, actually I will never walk again on roads alone. 

This person is a Criminal! 'Criminal' is a person who commits some crime without thinking what consequences may be faced by one who is victim of a Crime.

Should a person like that be Spared? What is the punishment for causing so much suffering to me? Yes, My Friends I am talking for the motion 'Criminals are wicked and should be punished' 

A wrong done under any circumstances is a wrong. A poor person who wants to give food to his son will commit robbery or murder, If this poor man murders a young man just for money should he be left away? Who has given him right to harm others because he is in need? Would it not be better if a poor person just eat something from a Garbage can?

(remaining you fill)

  • 19

Arguments in favour of the motion:
a) Criminals deserve punishment as they are wicked. If they are not punished they will continue committing crime which will destabilize the society. Appropriate punishment will act as deterrent for the criminals to take to the path of crime.
b) If criminals are not punished for their crimes it will be an injustice to the victims.
c) Criminals deserve punishment as they cannot be reformed without being punished.

d) Since the doer of good work is rewarded with appreciation then it follows that evil doer like criminals is awarded with punishment.

e) If criminals are not punished people will not differentiate between criminal and non-criminal activities.

 

  • 12

 Arguments in favour of the motion: 

a) Criminals deserve punishment as they are wicked. If they are not punished they will continue committing crime which will destabilize the society. Appropriate punishment will act as deterrent for the criminals to take to the path of crime. 
b) If criminals are not punished for their crimes it will be an injustice to the victims. 
c) Criminals deserve punishment as they cannot be reformed without being punished.

d) Since the doer of good work is rewarded with appreciation then it follows that evil doer like criminals is awarded with punishment.

e) If criminals are not punished people will not differentiate between criminal and non-criminal activities.

  • 3

Arguments in favour of the motion:

a) criminals are like wild beast knowing no mercy.
b)have no chance of reformation even if given opportunities.
c)deserve severest punishment to teach others against repetition of such nonhuman crimes.
d)severest physical punishments given to them in gulf countries support this view.

Arguments in  against the motion:
a)taking ones life is unpardonable as one cannot give one life.
b) various avenues for reformation may be used.
c) love pardon mercy pity greatest human virtues to change the heart even of a hardcore criminal.
d)such examples in plenty in history.
e)crime to be hated not the criminals.  

hope it satisfy you
  • 5

criminals are wicked and should be punished otherwise they will keep on taking lives of the innocent. They are not humans and dont deserve to live in the world.

  • -2
Criminals deserve punishishment as they are wicked.If they are not punished they will continue committing crime which will destabilize the society. Appropriate punishment will act as deterrent for the criminals to take to the path of crime.  If criminals are not punished for their crimes it will be an injustice to the victims.Criminals deserve punishment as they cannot be reformed without being punished. Since the doer of good work is rewarded with appreciation then it follows that evil doer like criminals is awarded with punishment. If criminals are not punished people will not differentiate between criminal and non-criminal activities.
  • 12
yes its right but it is not good
 
  • -7
no
 
  • -8
A person do the Crime as he is having some problems. Mindset of Criminals can be changed by doing various reformation. A good example is about the story of Lord buddha were a Cruel Man called Angulimal was changed into his disciple by the Lord Buddha's virtue. Earlier Angulimal was a very fury and cruel man who cuts the fingers of all the visitors who went through his Jungle. Later he was changed in a man of Compassion by Lord Buddha's Teaching. So my point we should treat the Criminals like Human being not like Animals. If we been cruel to the Criminals then they will never get Changed. So let be teach the meaning of life then sure they will be changed. As they too have the heart to love.
  • 6
No one becomes a criminal unless and until the situation favours so. Situation makes someone a criminal and someone a priest. So before deciding that someone is wicked and deserves punishment we should first look at the background of the crime. Thee should be justice and a second chance for all.
  • 3
Before punishing the criminals the reason of their crime should be overlooked.this should be also ensured that if they doing it for someone else or not.they should be punished but before that it should be made clear that the man for whom the crime had been done should be punished...also this should be ensured that whether they have done it or anyone else had done this using their name....after clearing all this the man should be wicked or punished if he deserves
  • 0
it is in my humble belief, that anyone convicted of a crime, however big or small should receive a fixed, no parole jail time of say 10 years. Sound authoritarian and Orwellian doesn't it? Well here is the reasoning behind it,
1) if someone commits a small crime for eg, steal a loaf of bread and is given 10 years jail time then the remaining 50 other criminals behind him, will think at least a dozen times before committing a crime. so, strict punishment acts as a deterrent.
2) this will effectively reduce the crime rates in a country/society and make it a better place to live in.
3) since there will be reduced crime rates, the courts will be less tied up and important cases can be argued within sufficient time and a quick verdict can be given for justice delayed is justice denied.
4)again, due to reduced crime rates, the funds allocated per prison can be cut down and diverted for useful purposes,
these are my arguments in favor of criminals being punished. 



 
  • 3
Our first reaction to a provoking situation is passionate. For instance, if my friend said something a little mean about me, I might be FURIOUS about it at first. I may even choose to punch my friend in the face. However in time, chances are that I'll have calmed down and rationality will have had a chance to resignate. We are, after all, instincutal beings (though we do have the ability to process logic and reason and use discretion). Sometimes that discretion - or better judgment - takes a little time. Usually after the initial shock, heartbreak or anger of an emotional situation, we are able to come to terms with reality regarding the situation, and our opinion of what is at hand has changed. An example in modern society of this shift deals with the support if the war in Iraq. At first, public opinion for the war was high as the Bush administration threw words like 'weapons of mass destruction' and 'remember 9/11' around. Everyone wanted Osama dead, the Taliban destroyed and - ha - peace in the middle east. Yet here we are 5 years later and public opinion has certainly changed, to say the least! In March of 2003, 72% of Americans supported the war, whereas in February of 2008, only 38% still believed in the cause [1]. My point? This example is just one of many which illustrate how people may realize they "may have been wrong..." with their initial thought process or approach. Instead, I argue that justice delayed can actually LEAD TO justice being served, in the sense that time actually allows for clarity and the opportunity to take many things into account regarding what is moral/fair/just.
  • 1
In the bishop's candlesticks, what is the meaning of I wonder she had the audacity to send here again
  • 4
Speech on goid people makes a good society
  • -6
The convict was sent to prison because he had stolen for food. He was imprisoned for ten years where was beaten like a hound. He slept on the boards. He was made to eat filth. He had vermin on his body. He had turned into a wild beast due to the ill-treatment by the police in jail.
  • -1
Criminals are made by the different instances . But they should be punished because if they are not punished they will commit the same crime again and again . This will be a cheating with the people who were cheated by them . And this can give criminals a confidence that if they commit a crime they will not be punished.
  • -2
criminals deserve punishment
  • 1
Answer
  • 0
Alvida Alvida ya Shaheed e Karbala ya Shaheed
  • 0
What are you looking for?