debate on " its good that schools in future will have no books and no teachers "

 

I do agree that schools are going to look much different in the future. I believe there will be a lot more online and at home learning when it comes to students. However, we still do need teachers and other resources for the students to be successful and gain a full understanding of the material.We still need the human interaction and nurturing that only human beings can provide.
 

In a classroom, a teacher not only teaches facts but also adds their own personal experiences and perspectives. This helps students to comprehend information and actually enjoy the lesson as teachers help encourage discussions and conversations. A computer cant do that. Therefore a computer cannot even be an option for educating kids of the future.And why would we give in to the whims of this current generation? Why would we replace an emotionally-capable, wisdom-capable and experienced human teacher for a blank, eye-harmful screen? Why would we let our children be taught by a machine instead of an actual person? I don't see it, I can't see it. There are two sides to this problem, but I choose to believe that human teachers will always be the best. You know the reasons why. Computers are nothing like teachers. 
- Who will need to program them? Teachers will need to be there to make sure the children don't go wild.
- People who want to be teachers, can't if there are computers around.
- Computers will only follow what is programmed to do. Human teachers give children their point of view and some methods to do it. Computers will only do what method is programmed and nothing else. 

Teachers are people who contribute their time energy and wisdom in molding the students.A school is a place where we learn social interactions unlike like that of a computer where you don't have to look at a person's face while expressing your views or asking your doubts.In a school students learn with the guidance of teachers how to communicate with each other and how to possess leadership qualities.People fail to understand the reality that in real life interactions are not like being in a group in social networking sites.Apart from mental things there are physical problems also while using a computer.It is not good for the eyes and there will be a lot of distractions while using a computer.So I conclude a computer screen can never replace a book and a teacher.

 

 

  • 21
never replace a book and a teacher
  • -7
No, I don’t think so as robotic teachers are not so interactive with the students,but a human teacher will be interactive with the students.as the schools develop that doesn’t mean that the teacher’s will also be replaced. Even though both of them explain in the same way and clear the doubts but the human teacher explains it in a more loveable manner.
  • -5
I want to know the advantages of having such schools in future where there will be no books and teachers?
 
  • 2
I think in future schools, books will be replaced by the e- texts and the teachers would be mechanical as technology will develop more. The schools would be in a room beside their bedroom or living room in a house. Studying by ourselves increases our self- learning skills and helps us to make a good choice while in difficult situations.
  • 1
I think in future books will be replaced by the e-text and their will be no teacher in the future their will be robots only .but i think that teacher and books are the best because the robots can not share their experiance like our human teacher
  • 1
yes, it is good because we all know that a peper manufacture by wood and it is get from tree and if we reduce the use of paper then it save our environment
  • 1
No it is not good that schools in future will have no books and no teachers because when we read any chapter then if we have any doubt then we ask to our teachers then they clear our doubt and they also give us moral values , they inspired us and also they said that we can do anything if we labour hard if there were no teachers then we doesn't know the moral values, if one time we got bad marks then we leave our hope so it is not good that schools in future will have no books and no teachers
  • 0
?

I do agree that schools are going to look much different in the future. I believe there will be a lot more online and at home learning when it comes to students. However, we still do need teachers and other resources for the students to be successful and gain a full understanding of the material.We still need the human interaction and nurturing that only human beings can provide.
?

In a classroom, a teacher not only teaches facts but also adds their own personal experiences and perspectives. This helps students to comprehend information and actually enjoy the lesson as teachers help encourage discussions and conversations. A computer cant do that. Therefore a computer cannot even be an option for educating kids of the future.And why would we give in to the whims of this current generation? Why would we replace an emotionally-capable, wisdom-capable and experienced human teacher for a blank, eye-harmful screen? Why would we let our children be taught by a machine instead of an actual person? I don't see it, I can't see it. There are two sides to this problem, but I choose to believe that human teachers will always be the best. You know the reasons why.?Computers are nothing like teachers.?
- Who will need to program them? Teachers will need to be there to make sure the children don't go wild.
- People who want to be teachers, can't if there are computers around.
- Computers will only follow what is programmed to do. Human teachers give children their point of view and some methods to do it. Computers will only do what method is programmed and nothing else.?

Teachers are people who contribute their time energy and wisdom in molding the students.A school is a place where we learn social interactions unlike like that of a computer where you don't have to look at a person's face while expressing your views or asking your doubts.In a school students learn with the guidance of teachers how to communicate with each other and how to possess leadership qualities.People fail to understand the reality that in real life interactions are not like being in a group in social networking sites.Apart from mental things there are physical problems also while using a computer.It is not good for the eyes and there will be a lot of distractions while using a computer.So I conclude a computer screen can never replace a book and a teacher.

?

?
  • 0
Science
  • 0
No
It's not good
  • 0
No it is not good
  • 0
Yes it is our future
  • 0
My points for this statement is that it wont be good if we have no interaction with teachers. It may save our environment if we reduce the use of books instead have e-texts. But the teachers must be living that is they must not be robotic instead a real human being. Students need interaction to learn better
  • 0
No robotic teachers may be interactive but they are programmed to function in a similar way.. And here is my point. A human being can understand what is the mental state of a child while teaching and that is very important. This thing is not possible for the robotic teacher.
  • 0
Magic is eleven while tommy is thirteen year old
  • 0
What would you do if you found an injured bird while returning from your school?
  • 0
No I think it's not good that schools in future will hv no books nd no teachers coz without them the school will not remain schools they will become like a body without heart
Teachers r the only person who creates other proffesion and books r their like medicine for them
  • 1
What are you looking for?