Do you think carter was justified in removing the harden ritual resin deposits in tuts mummy

ofcourse yes..because if he had not done so..thiefs would most probably kill the guards and take away all the gold by tearing the mummy apart which carter could not afford to happen
 
  • -5
do you think carter was justified in removing the hardened ritual resin deposits on Tut's mummy?(6marks)
  • -5
do you think carter was justified in removing the hardened ritual resin deposits on Tut's mummy?(6marks)
 
  • -7
do you think carter was justified in removing the hardened ritual resin deposits on Tut's mummy?(6marks)sdsdf
  • -6
do you thing carte was justified in removing the hardened ritual resin deposits on tut s mummy? why/ why not? 120 words
  • -6
Do you think Carter was justified in removing the hunted ritual design deposit on towards mummy why why not
  • 12
Yes because In his defence,Carter had little choice.If he hadn't chiselled away mummy free,so thieves most would have cheated the guards and destroyed the mummy to remove all the gold.
  • 3
Discovering tut

  • 1
yes it was justified 
 
  • -2

Carter was investigating the tomb of King Tut in 1922. Amazingly, the tomb’s contents were in fact in spite of having been ransacked in antiquity. Carter found king Tut’s Mummy in three nested coffins, the most important find of all. To Carter’s dismay he found he could not study the mummy as it was stuck to the bottom of the coffin due the hardening of the funerary raisins Carter tried ‘legitimate force’ but could not dislodge the mummy from its these in the coffin.  So he cut the mummy in several parts, removed its head and severed almost all the joints. Carter’s action was highly condemnable as he nearly destroyed the mummy. His defence was that if not be robbers and vandals would have done the same. Historians, however, have not forgiven Carter for this disfigurement.

  • 3
ffwtt
  • 2
What are you looking for?