doctrine of lapse - this was one of the cruel policies of the british which bacame a major reason fr the revolt of 1857. before the estaBLISHMENT OF BRITISH RULE IN INDIA ADOPTion of a child by a ruler was an accepted practice . according to the doctrine of lapse if any indian ruler died without having a natural hier then that particular state would be annexed by the british. they would not accept any adopted child . jhansi was annexed by the britishers by this policy
- -4
doctrine of lapse- as per doctrine of lapse, if the king had no son or a successor for continuing the kingdom,the kingdom would be taken away by the britishers.This happened with laxmi bai as she had an adopted son, the britishers did not accept with rani laxmi bai that her adopted son could not continue the kingdom.Doctrine of lapse was established by lord dal housie
- -4
the doctrine of lapse was devised by lord dalhousie.the doctrine declared that if an indian ruler died without a male heir to his kingdom ,his kingdom would be a part of british territory.the kingdoms of jhansi,nagpur,sambalpur and udaipur were annexed according to this policy
- -4
The Doctrine of Lapse was an annexation policy purportedly devised by Lord Dalhousie, who was the Governor General for the East India Company in India between 1848 and 1856. According to the Doctrine, any princely state or territory under the direct influence (paramountcy) of the British East India Company (the dominantimperial power in the subcontinent), as a vassal state under the British Subsidiary System, would automatically be annexed if the ruler was either "manifestly incompetent or died without a direct heir".[1] The latter supplanted the long-established right of an Indian sovereign without an heir to choose a successor. In addition, the British decided whether potential rulers were competent enough. The doctrine and its application were widely regarded by Indians as illegitimate.
At the time of its adoption, the Company had absolute, imperial administrative jurisdiction over many regions spread over the subcontinent. The company took over the princely states of Satara (1848), Jaipur and Sambalpur (1849), Nagpur and Jhansi (1854), Tanjore and Arcot (1855) and Awadh(Oudh)(1856) and Udaipur using this doctrine. The Company added about four million pounds sterling to its annual revenue by use of this doctrine.[2]
The British took over Awadh in 1856 with the reason that the ruler was not ruling properly. This led to a revolution.
With the increasing power of the East India Company, discontent simmered amongst many sections of Indian society and the largely indigenous armed forces; these rallied behind the deposed dynasties during the Indian rebellion of 1857 also known as the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857 . Following the rebellion, in 1858, the new BritishViceroy of India, whose rule replaced that of the British East India Company, renounced the doctrine.[3]
The princely state of Kittur was taken over by the East India Company in 1824 by imposing a 'Doctrine Of Lapse'. So it is debatable whether it was actually devised by Lord Dalhousie in 1848, though he arguably did make it official by putting it to paper-and-ink. Dalhousie's annexations and the doctrine of lapse had caused suspicion and uneasiness in the mind of almost all ruling princes in India.
- -4
- -4
- -4
- -4
- -3
Example of states under Doctrine's of Lapse are:
1)Jhansi
2)Nagpur etc
2)
- -3
- -3
- -3
- 2
- 1
Means
During British rule ,In this system the ruler of protected state ( of British) can not adopt a child and make him a king of his state , if king died of natural heir than that state would not pass to adopted child. Lastly,Jhansi and satara fell prey to this.
- 1
- 2
- 0
The policy is most commonly associated with Lord Dalhousie, who was the Governor General of the East India Company in India between 1848 and 1856. However, it was articulated by the Court of Directors of the East India Company as early as 1834 and several smaller states were already annexed under this doctrine before Dalhousie took over the post of Governor-General. Dalhousie used the policy most vigorously and extensively, though, so it is generally associated with him. The accession of Lord Dalhousie inaugurated a new chapter in the history of British India. He functioned as the Governor-General of India from 1848-1856.
- 0
2. He devised a policy that came to be known as the Doctrine of Lapse.
3. The Doctrine declared the if any Indian ruler died without a male heir his kingdom would "lapse", that is become part of company territory.
- 0
- 0
- 0
- 0
The Doctrine of Lapse was an annexation policy purportedly devised by Lord Dalhousie, who was the Governor General for the East India Company in India between 1848 and 1856. According to the Doctrine, any princely state or territory under the direct influence (paramountcy) of the British East India Company (the dominantimperial power in the subcontinent), as a vassal state under the British Subsidiary System, would automatically be annexed if the ruler was either "manifestly incompetent or died without a direct heir".[1] The latter supplanted the long-established right of an Indian sovereign without an heir to choose a successor. In addition, the British decided whether potential rulers were competent enough. The doctrine and its application were widely regarded by Indians as illegitimate.
At the time of its adoption, the Company had absolute, imperial administrative jurisdiction over many regions spread over the subcontinent. The company took over the princely states of Satara (1848), Jaipur and Sambalpur (1849), Nagpur and Jhansi (1854), Tanjore and Arcot (1855) and Awadh(Oudh)(1856) and Udaipur using this doctrine. The Company added about four million pounds sterling to its annual revenue by use of this doctrine.[2]
The British took over Awadh in 1856 with the reason that the ruler was not ruling properly. This led to a revolution.
With the increasing power of the East India Company, discontent simmered amongst many sections of Indian society and the largely indigenous armed forces; these rallied behind the deposed dynasties during the Indian rebellion of 1857 also known as the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857 . Following the rebellion, in 1858, the new BritishViceroy of India, whose rule replaced that of the British East India Company, renounced the doctrine.[3]
The princely state of Kittur was taken over by the East India Company in 1824 by imposing a 'Doctrine Of Lapse'. So it is debatable whether it was actually devised by Lord Dalhousie in 1848, though he arguably did make it official by putting it to paper-and-ink. Dalhousie's annexations and the doctrine of lapse had caused suspicion and uneasiness in the mind of almost all ruling princes in India.
- 0
- 0