Here, ?1,70,000 includes abnormal loss of ?50,000, which if not already included needed to be added. So, why have they added it again in the solution?? I think that at it's place it should have been written "after charging", if we need to follow this solution, isn't it?? Kindly confirm.

Dear Student
As mentioned in question is correct and you can consider it that way too that it is "after charging"  or "after deducting" also. They mentioned "included" because they include that deduction.


Regards

  • 1
What are you looking for?