how were the ideas of phan boi chau different from phan chu trinh?

Phan boi chau wanted to fully discard french ideals and adopt monarchy whreas phan chu trinh did not want to fully abolish french ideals. he wanted a democratic republic.

  • 6

common- both of them were against the french colonialism

diffrence- phan boi chau;s main objective was to drive the french out from vietnam and set up the constitutional monarchy, while panh chu trinh was opposed to the idea of using the court to drive the french out he first wanted to finish the monarchy with french help if needed and then set up republic of vietnam

  • 75

If asked for more marks wht do we write?

  • -11
Answer on page no. 41 history book,
Prefer NCERT
  • -9
Phan Boi chau wants freedom from freinch but not in terms of republic democracy,in term of monarchy while phan chu trihn wants republic democracy
  • -12
Similarity- they both wants freedom from french. Difference - phan boi chau wants that french should be out of veitnam and adopt monarchy Phan chau trinh wants democratic government and does not thought to abolish french.
  • 7
Phan chu Trinh wanted a democratic republic. He was influenced by the democratic ideals of west and did not want a wholesale rejection of western civilization. Phan boi chau was pioneer of Vietnamese 20th century nationalism . He was a Confucian scholar . He wanted the formation of revolutionary society. He wrote a book " The history of the loss of Vietnam "
  • -5
Here you go

  • 14
Pan Boi Chau was a veitnamese nationalist. He formed the evolutionary society in 1903.He wanted to overthrow the French rule with the help of monarchy. Pan Chu Trinh was a veitnamese nationalist. He was against Monarchy . He wanted to establish a morden democratic republic . He supported the French idea of Liberty Equality and Fraternity
  • 13
yes
  • -17
No
  • -14
The scholars' revolt 1. Started in 1868 was led by officials at the imperial court. 2. These officials were angered by the spread of catholicism and French power . They led a general aprising in Ngu An and Ha Tien proviences whereover a thousand catholics were killed. 4. The French successfully crashed the movement but this uprising inspired other patriots to rise up against them.
  • -8
How did the battle against French become ap part of independence of Vietnam .explain
  • -7
What is there inside the burmuda triangle
  • -12
The Geneva Conference (April 26 – July 20, 1954[1]) was a conference among several nations that took place in Geneva, Switzerland, in order to settle outstanding issues resulting from the Korean War and discuss the possibility of restoring peace in Indochina.[2] The Soviet Union, the United States, France, the United Kingdom, and the People's Republic of China were participants throughout the conference, while other countries concerned were represented during the discussion of questions of interest to them.[3] These included the countries that contributed troops to the United Nations forces in the Korean War, and countries that participated in the resolution of the First Indochina War between France and the Việt Minh. The part of the conference on the Korean question ended without adopting any declarations or proposals. On Indochina, the conference produced a set of documents known as the Geneva Accords. These agreements temporarily separated Vietnam into two zones, a northern zone to be governed by the Việt Minh, and a southern zone to be governed by the State of Vietnam, then headed by former emperor Bảo Đại. A Conference Final Declaration, issued by the British chairman of the conference, provided that a general election be held by July 1956 to create a unified Vietnamese state. Although presented as a consensus view, this document was not accepted by the delegates of either the State of Vietnam or the United States. In addition, three separate ceasefire accords, covering Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam, were signed at the conference.
  • -10
the second is phan chu trinh
 
  • -6
Explain any five reasons in which the leaders Explain any five ways in which leaders and students organised resistance against the French in Vietnam
  • -5
It was a French law permitted christianity and out buddhisim.
  • -9
Ho Chi minh trail symbolised how the veitnames used a limited resources to great advantages. the trail on the immense network of Footpath and road was used to transport man and material from north to south. It was improved in late 9050 from 1967 about 20000 North Vietnamese troops cames South each month. the trail had supported bases and Hospital along the way. Mostly supplies were carried by much by porters in their backs or on the bicycle.
  • 2
Phan Boi Chau: (i) He believed that first the foreign enemy must be driven out and then after their nation's independence they could think of other things.
(ii) His plan was to make use of monarchy. He wanted to raise up the Vietnamese to end the monarchy in due course of time.
(iii) He was greatly influenced by the china and excepted a political framework headed by a monarch. 
(iv) He advocated for the help of the court to resist the french. 
 
Phan chu Trinh: (i) He wanted to overthrow the foreign enemy but at the same time he was not against the french legal and educational institutions in Vietnam.
(ii)He disagreed with Phan Boi Chau on the terms of monarchy. He believed in overthrowing the monarchy to promote popular rights. 
(iii) He wished to  establish democratic republic in Vietnam. He was deeply influenced by the democratic ideals of west and did not want a complete rejection of western civilisation. 
(iv) He opposed the idea of resisting the french with the help of the court.

NOTE: Please write it in a tabular form for better understanding.
  • 117
Phan's must influenced book,was the history
  • -11
Phan boi chau- 1) he was educated in confucian tradition and followed confucianism. 2) He wanted to set up constitutional monarchy after driving out french from vietnam 3) he was inspired by china and lamneted on severing of ties with china . He wanted wholesale rejection of western civilistaion. 4) he wanted the help of court to resist the french . Phan chu trinh - 1)he accepted western thoughts and belived jn the french idea of liberty 2) he desired to establish a democratic republic. 3)he wanted to overthrow monarchy and was hostile towards it.he even favoured for the french hepl if needed to set up republic. 4) he opposed the idea of resisting french with the help of court.
  • 10
Phan boi chau: Wanted to drive french out and wanted to set up constitutional monarchy
Phan chu trinh: Opposed the idea of driving out french with the help of thr court
  • -4
Differences between ideas of Phan Boi Chau and Phan Chu Trinh:
PHAN BOI CHAU PHAN CHU TRINH
1. He advocated that first the foreign enemy should be driven out and after achieving independence, other things should be discussed. 1. He wished to overthrow the monarchy in order to create a basis for promotion of popular rights.
2. He was of the opinion that the monarchy should be used to achieve their object. 2. He was absolutely against the monarchy.
3. He was not in favour of raising people to abolish the monarchy. 3. He planned to raise up the people to abolish the monarchy.
 hope it helps!
  • 20
Phan Boi Chau: (i) He believed that first the foreign enemy must be driven out and then after their nation's independence they could think of other things. (ii) His plan was to make use of monarchy. He wanted to raise up the Vietnamese to end the monarchy in due course of time. (iii) He was greatly influenced by the china and excepted a political framework headed by a monarch. (iv) He advocated for the help of the court to resist the french. Phan chu Trinh: (i) He wanted to overthrow the foreign enemy but at the same time he was not against the french legal and educational institutions in Vietnam. (ii)He disagreed with Phan Boi Chau on the terms of monarchy. He believed in overthrowing the monarchy to promote popular rights. (iii) He wished to establish democratic republic in Vietnam. He was deeply influenced by the democratic ideals of west and did not want a complete rejection of western civilisation. (iv) He opposed the idea of resisting the french with the help of the court. NOTE: Please write it in a tabular form for better understanding.
  • 0
elieved that first the foreign enemy must be driven out and then after their nation's independence they could think of other things. (ii) His plan was to make use of monarchy. He wanted to raise up the Vietnamese to end the monarchy in due course of time. (iii) He was greatly influenced by the china and excepted a political framework headed by a monarch. (iv) He advocated for the help of the court Phan chu Trinh: (i) He wanted to overthrow the foreign enemy but at the same time he was not against the french legal and educational institutions in Vietnam. (ii)He disagreed with Phan Boi Chau on the terms of monarchy. He believed in overthrowing the monarchy to promote popular rights. (iii) He wished to establish democratic republic in Vietnam. He was deeply influenced by the democratic ideals of west and did not want a complete rejection of western civilisation. (iv) He opposed the idea of resisting the french with the help of the court. NOTE: Please write it in a tabular form for better understanding.
  • 2
phan boi cha was the auther of 'The history of the loss of veitnam. The loss of soveregnity and the severing of the ties with china that bound the elites of the two countries within a shared culture. phan chu trinh vietnamese nationalist wanted to established a democratic republic in vietnam.
  • -2
Kaha ho bhai
  • 0
Chau wanted to use the monarchy and was not want to raise up the people to abolish monarchy. While trinh was absolutely against monarchy and was in favour of rising the people to abolish monarchy.
  • 0
Phan Boi Chau ;)
(1) he accepted monarchy.
(2) he didn't want to revolt against monarchy.
(3) he wanted to get the help of monarchy to oppose French rule.
(4) he supported Vietnamese culture and opposed western ideas.
(5) he wanted to build a constitutional monarchy.
(6) he wrote a book named as " The history of the loss of Vietnam".

Phan Chu Trinh;)
(1) he wished to overthrow monarchy.
(2) he wanted to revolt against monarchy.
(3) he didn't wanted to get the help of monarch to oppose French rule.
(4) he supported modern ideas such as liberty , equality and fraternity
(5) he wanted to build a republic
  • -2
Please find this answer

  • 0
Phan Boi Chau ;) (1) he accepted monarchy. (2) he didn't want to revolt against monarchy. (3) he wanted to get the help of monarchy to oppose French rule. (4) he supported Vietnamese culture and opposed western ideas. (5) he wanted to build a constitutional monarchy. (6) he wrote a book named as " The history of the loss of Vietnam". Phan Chu Trinh;) (1) he wished to overthrow monarchy. (2) he wanted to revolt against monarchy. (3) he didn't wanted to get the help of monarch to oppose French rule. (4) he supported modern ideas such as liberty , equality and fraternity (5) he wanted to build a republic.
  • 0
Phan Boi Chau:?(i) He believed that first the foreign enemy must be driven out and then after their nation's independence they could think of other things.
(ii) His plan was to make use of monarchy. He wanted to raise up the Vietnamese to end the monarchy in due course of time.
(iii) He was greatly influenced by the china and excepted a political?framework headed by a monarch.?
(iv) He advocated for the help of the court to resist the french.?
?
Phan?chu Trinh:?(i) He wanted to overthrow the foreign enemy but at the same time he was not against?the french legal and educational institutions in Vietnam.
(ii)He disagreed?with Phan Boi Chau?on the terms of monarchy. He believed in overthrowing the monarchy to promote popular rights.?
(iii) He wished to? establish democratic republic in Vietnam. He was deeply influenced by the democratic ideals of west and did not want a complete?rejection of western civilisation.?
(iv) He opposed the idea of resisting the french with the help of the court.
  • 1
pedicel
  • 0
Please find this answer

  • 0
What are you looking for?