Pls answer the question no 16 ...for 5 marks

Dear student,

Here is the answer:

Development often leads to conflicting outcomes in which some sections of society gain while others suffer. What may be development for one may be destruction for other. We can support this statement with two examples.


1. Building of large dams: The building of large dams can benefit large number of people by providing electricity and water for drinking and irrigation. But it can also adversely affect those people who need to be displaced to build the dam and water reservoir. For example, the construction of the Sardar Sarovar dam has led to problems of displacement of the people who were staying near the river. The displaced people who lose their homes need to be properly rehabilitated.

2. Mining in remote areas: It can benefit the economy by providing employment and raw material for the industries. But such remote areas are often inhabited by tribals who have lived there for generations. The tribal people often get displaced by such mining activities and they lose their traditional measures of livelihood that they had been practising.  

​​​​Regards

  • 0
Ask MR LOVE
call MR LOVE
  • 0
Hiiiiiiiiii
  • 0
Mlkit who is MR LOVE
.thinking
  • 0
Can I give u the answer tommorrow
  • 0
Consequences of environmental degradation do not respect national or state boundaries;

this issue is no longer region or nation specific.

Thus development in one country may be hazardous to the environment of another country.

For example, the Multinational Companies are taking away land from poor farmers to build their industries. It is development for the company but is destruction for the poor farmers. Another example could be that in the case of the Sardar Sarovar Dam being built over river Narmada where the tribes are being forced to evacuate their villages. The dam being built is development for the country but is a destruction for the tribes.
  • 0
Kaur I'm having this answer in my notebook of class 10 bt I have to take it out so can I tell u tomorrow
  • 0
Okk dii...u can give it tomorrow
  • 0
Ohk bye dear
  • 0
Mujhe pta nhi he ye kon he ..mlkit soo plsss na don't repeat this plsss ...

Naam ta dass kon aa?.
  • 0
Bbyy dii
  • 0
Anyways...
Hii to all..
  • 0
Yaar tussi na galll hi na kro hun me bht kuch jnda ya todde bare cheee
  • 0
Kise ko mat bata na mae kon hu
  • 0
It is true that development for one may not be development for the other.
(i) More wages means development for a worker, but it can go against the entrepreneur.
(ii) A rich farmer or trader wants to sell food grains at a higher price but a poor worker wants to purchase it for low prices.
(iii) Construction of a dam means more and cheap power, but people, who will lose their habitat will demonstrate.
(iv) To get more electricity, the industrialists may want more dams. But this may submerge the agricultural land, and disrupt the lives of the people.
  • 0
Achha vdiya aa fer ...continue...

Bs aa ds dendi aa ki mr lv nu me nhi janadi...kon aa oo?...pta nhi ,,, bs tusi hee janade aa.

Pta nee inna rudely gall kyo ..me kee kitta?
  • 0
? Yes, it is true that what may be called development for some may turn out to be destruction for the others. For example, the Sardar Sarovar dam built over the Narmada river led to a major evacuation of the tribes near the Narmada river and as a result the tribes lost their land and homes. This development of Sardar sarovar dam turned out to be a destruction for the tribes. Another example, On the border of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh, in the Singrauli region, over 200,000 people have been displaced on different occasions. First by the Rihand dam, then by a series of thermal power plants of the National Thermal Power Corporation. Singrauli has illuminated the lives of many in the urban centres, but has seen its natives groping in endless darkness, grappling to overcome the trauma of displacement. So the development in Singrauli led to destruction of its people. Multinational companies take away the land of the farmers for the construction of industries. It may be beneficial for boosting production but at the same time it causes loss of cultivable land and livelihood of the farmers. Various movements have been launched against the acquisition of land from the farmers.
  • 0
B bye u continue sorry for disturbing
  • 0
Okk ...keep ignoring mee..koi na .
  • 0
Nhi kuchh nhi ..
Me ladai nhi krna chahndi...
Bs aai puch rhi aa kee kon aa oo..menu v ta dasso ,, mera naam usde naal na jodya kro plsss ...ptani koi v aa ..

N me na bahut pyr nl gall krdi aa ,,
Ladai hui ta me jarur haar jaungi...
Ese krke plsss ...

Hor agr fer tusi usda name bolna hee aa ta fer menu hune ,, right now,, screenshot dasso .
Me v ta dekkha kon aa oh...

N plsss pyr nal gall krlya kro mena
  • 0
Me ta tannu ...brother mandi aa ..
Pr tusi fer idda kr rhe oo na.
Sis nal inna kon ladai krda aa yrr......
  • 0
What are you looking for?