"Students develop intellectually in the
classroom, and aesthetically through
co-curricular activities. Write a debate
in 150-200 words for the motion"....pls experts...answer fast...pls
give the whole debate....dont give
links....i need it urgently...answer fast

Dear Student,
Such questions are made for enhancing the self creative skills and should be tried answering on your own. However, here are a few points that will help you in framing your answer:

For the motion:
a) A skilled and academically gifted student is always better than a student with just good academic score.
b) Various aspects if taken into consideration won't hamper a student such as getting the right answers to how many hours one needs to study, is it possible to attend classes during the process of preparation, how much do the other activities really matter etc.

c) Co-curricular activities prepare students practically for the future. The overall personality development occurs only with students' equal footing in all the spheres of life. 
d) Students whose only experience of school or college is one of rigid academic study may not be able to apply what they have learned in practice. If the co-curriculum was given an equal importance in the student's everyday schedule, it would lead to improvement in the student ability to grasp things as a whole, because students will have received a more rounded education.

You may feel free to contact us if you face any issue or difficulty while composing your answer. You can also send us your answers here for a feedback and required corrections, if any.

Regards


​​​​​


​​
​​​​​

  • 0
What are you looking for?