Those public sector undertakings which are making profits should be privatised? Do you agree? Why?

Yes, I agree for your question.
  • -2
A ledger is used as a base for the
  • -2
Journal
  • -1
Madhu goswami read my question again then right answer
  • 2
Write*
  • 2
Muskan singh write answer of why part also
  • 2
Ishita I told them what you asked me to.
  • 2
Please find this answer

  • -2
Thank you Ishita
  • 2
Poverty
  • -2
The PSUs which are making profits should not be privatized because they are revenue generator for the government. But if a PSU is an inefficient and loss making one, then the same PSU exerts unnecessary burden on the government?s scarce revenues and further may lead to budget deficit. The loss making PSUs should be privatised. Further some of the PSUs like, water, railways, etc. enhance the welfare of nation and is meant to serve general public at a very nominal cost. Privatisation of such important PSUs will lead to loss of welfare of poor people. Hence, only less important PSUs should be privatised while leaving the core and important PSUs to be owned by the public sector. Instead of privatisation of profit-making PSUs, government can allow more degree of autonomy and accountability in their operations, which will not only increase their productivity and efficiency but also enhance their competitiveness with their private counterparts.
  • 2
No ) , although they are evading constitutional responsibility that a government owned company should not make profits but still they play an important role in an economy.If they are too privatised then private sectors will have monoply in market and make the price of products much more higher ie inflation .( in case of govt company)
In case of departmental undertaking , these are under ministries and are useful and suitable where national security of country is there . So it should not be privatised
  • 2
Thank you Sparsh and Muskan Singh??!!!
  • 1
The PSUs which are making profits should not be privatized because they are revenue generator for the government. But if a PSU is an inefficient and loss making one, then the same PSU exerts unnecessary burden on the government?s scarce revenues and further may lead to budget deficit. The loss making PSUs should be privatised. Further some of the PSUs like, water, railways, etc. enhance the welfare of nation and is meant to serve general public at a very nominal cost. Privatisation of such important PSUs will lead to loss of welfare of poor people. Hence, only less important PSUs should be privatised while leaving the core and important PSUs to be owned by the public sector. Instead of privatisation of profit-making PSUs, government can allow more degree of autonomy and accountability in their operations, which will not only increase their productivity and efficiency but also enhance their competitiveness with their private counterparts.
  • 1
No ) , although they are evading constitutional responsibility that a government owned company should not make profits but still they play an important role in an economy.If they are too privatised then private sectors will have monoply in market and make the price of products much more higher ie inflation .( in case of govt company)
In case of departmental undertaking , these are under ministries and are useful and suitable where national security of country is there . So it should not be privatised
  • 1
What are you looking for?