An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind When turning on the television, radio, or simply opening the local newspaper, we are continuously having flow with news of arrests, murders, homicides, serial killers, and other such tragedies. It is a rare occasion to go throughout a day in this brutal world and not hear any of these things. It has been discovered that 10% of the crimes were committed following the principle of an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth This extremely  surprising  statistic awaken  a disagreement  of whether or not an eye for an eye is the correct basis of determining an appropriate punishment, as it not only touches upon political, but also cultural, ethical, or even religious issues. It would be easier to analyze the notion mentioned above on a relatively smaller scale. I believe that almost every single one of you have seen the scene of two students standing in the school principles office, and one of them saying that he or she just hit the other person in return with no purpose of actually harming them. More frequently, you would hear people saying things like Oh, I just wanted to revenge and show him my power.

 

 

When Gandhi warns us of the dangers of an eye for an eye, he tells us that there will never be an end to violence as long as there is someone who always  give rise to it. And his method was proved to be successful in defeating the British. The action where one event causes a series of similar events to take place one after the other. The reality forces us to consider whether to take revenge. In period of time I strongly recommend all of us to actually think about the disadvantages of taking revenge. The images of the whole world being blind are reappearing inside me constantly, as I am finishing off this article. Instead of turning yourself from a victim to a criminal  make an attempt to compromise by mutually understanding the potential offender. It might turn out to be that the person who hit your hand did not do it on purpose, or even if he did it deliberately, do not take revenge, as you will be harmed and punished as well. We have a model leader, Gandhi, who succeeded without committing anything dreadful or violent. In the end, I would also state my opinion that the death penalty should be banned as it follows the principle of life for life. 

 

 

 

please give questions for this speech and also if there is any mistakes please tell i want it very fast 

Such questions need to be attempted on your own to test your creative writing skills. However, these points might help you elaborate:
- The sentences are far too long and confusing. Break them up into smaller and simpler sentences.

- Subject verb agreement needs to be checked: use of 'have vs has'; use of 'give vs gives'(first sentence of second paragraph).

Questions:

- Do you think Gandhi's policy of non-violence is as valid today as it was years ago? If so, why?

- Why are incidents of road rage on the rise?

  • 0
What are you looking for?