Purchase mobileappIcon Download our Mobile App
Call Us at 011-40705070   or  
Click to Call
Select your Board & Class
  • Select Board
  • Select Class

j.j thomson model of an atom explain in dettail with pic...for my project..

Asked by Dhruv Dewett(student) , on 29/10/13

Answers

Thomson 's Atomic Model

 [J. J. Thomson 's  raisin bread model  (plum pudding model)]
 J. J. Thomson  considered  that the structure  of an atom is  something like a  raisin bread,  so that his atomic model  is sometimes called  the raisin bread model.  He assumed  that the basic body  of an atom is  a spherical object  containing N  electrons confined  in homogeneous jellylike  but relatively massive positive  charge distribution  whose total charge cancels  that of the  N electrons.  The schematic drawing  of this model is shown  in the following figure.  Thomson 's model is sometimes  dubbed a  plum pudding model.


 [Thomson 's Model  and Alpha Particle Scattering]
 As stated  on the preceding page,  Geiger and Marsden  carried out an experiment  in which  the alpha rays  were collided  against a thin metal foil.  Their results showed  that almost all incident alpha  particles penetrate  the foil and go straight  in forward direction  but a few are scattered  in very large angles.
 Is it possible  to explain this result  by using  Thomson 's model?  This question will be  studied below,  but  before explaining it,  let us present  the answer in advance:  The results of  the alpha particle scattering  cannot be explained  by Thomson 's atomic model.  Thomson 's raisin bread model  (plum pudding model)  therefore cannot  be valid  as an atomic model.
 The reason will be  explained below.  Since we need somewhat  detailed mathematical expressions,  it will be given  on the other page,
 2-4-A: Alpha Particle Scattering by Thomson 's model
 As seen  on the other page (2-4-A),  we can consider that  the scattering angle  of the alpha particle  by Thomson 's model  is at most 0.01 degrees.
 The thickness of  the metal foil  in the scattering experiment  of the alpha rays  is about 10-6 m.  When assuming  that the atoms are  tightly packed  in the metal,  there are about 10000 atoms  lining up  in the direction  of thickness,  because the size  of an atom is  approximately 10-10m.  (See the following figure.)



 When the alpha particle  collides with these atoms  in the metal foil  10000 times successively,  the scattering angle  of each individual collision  in such a multiple scattering  is less than 0.01 degrees  as discussed above.  The resultant scattering angle  is obtained  by an accumulation of  these individual scatterings  of 10000 times.  One may expect that,  even if the scattering angle  of each individual scattering  is very small like 0.01 degrees,  we can have  as large resultant angle  as

 This is however  unrealistic,  because the direction  of each individual scattering  must be random,  and an accumulation  of random values would give  nearly zero only.  So that we never obtain  such a large resultant scattering  angle after the multiple  scattering.
 Accordingly,  such a large scattering angle  as those obtained  in Geiger and Marsden 's experiment  cannot be reproduced  by such a multiple  scattering as stated above.  Thus we can conclude that  Thomson 's atomic model  is not held.

Posted by Aadhav(student)on 3/1/12

badges

With the growing evidence that the atom is composed of even smaller particles, attention was given to how the particles fit together. In the early 1900s J. J. Thomson reasoned that because electrons comprise only a very small fraction of the mass of an atom, they probably were responsible for an equally small fraction of the atom 's size. He proposed that the atom consisted of a uniform positive sphere of matter in which the electrons were embedded, as shown in Figure 2.8. This model became known as the "plum-pudding" model, after the name of a traditional English dessert. Thomson 's atomic model was very short-lived.

Figure 2.8 J. J. Thomson 's "plum-pudding" model of the atom. He pictured the small electrons to be embedded in the atom much like raisins in a pudding or like seeds in a watermelon. Ernest Rutherford proved this model wrong.

hope dis 1 will help!! : )

Posted by Kanika(student)on 3/1/12

badges

ok i wil try 2 give u another anser!! : ))

Posted by Kanika(student)on 3/1/12

badges

A schematic presentation of the plum pudding model of the atom. In Thomson 's mathematical model the "corpuscles" (or modern electrons) were arranged non-randomly, in rotating rings.

Theplum pudding modelof theatombyJ. J. Thomson, who discovered theelectronin 1897, was proposed in 1904 before the discovery of the atomic nucleus in order to add the electron to the atomic model. In this model, the atom is composed of electrons (which Thomson still called "corpuscles", thoughG. J. Stoneyhad proposed that atoms of electricity be calledelectronsin 1894 [1] ) surrounded by a soup of positive charge to balance the electrons ' negative charges, like negatively-charged "plums" surrounded by positively-charged "pudding". The electrons (as we know them today) were thought to be positioned throughout the atom, but with many structures possible for positioning multiple electrons, particularly rotating rings of electrons (see below). Instead of a soup, the atom was also sometimes said to have had a "cloud" of positive charge.

With this model, Thomson abandoned his earlier "nebular atom" hypothesis in which the atom was composed of immaterial vorticies. Now, at least part of the atom was to be composed of Thomson 's particulate negative corpuscles, although the rest of the positively-charged part of the atom remained somewhat nebulous and ill-defined.

The 1904 Thomson model was disproved by the 1909gold foil experiment, which was interpreted byErnest Rutherfordin 1911 [2] [3] to imply a very small nucleus of the atom containing a very high positive charge (in the case of gold, enough to balance about 100 electrons), thus leading to theRutherford modelof the atom. Although gold has an atomic number of 79, immediately after Rutherford 's paper appeared in 1911Antonius Van den Broekmade the intuitive suggestion that atomic numberisnuclear charge. The matter required experiment to decide.Henry Moseley 's work showed experimentally in 1913 (seeMoseley 's law) that the effective nuclear charge was very close to the atomic number (Moseley found only one unit difference), and Moseley referenced only the papers of Van den Broek and Rutherford. This work culminated in the solar-system-like (but quantum-limited)Bohr modelof the atom in the same year, in which a nucleus containing an atomic number of positive charge is surrounded by an equal number of electrons in orbital shells. Bohr had also inspired Moseley 's work.

Thomson 's model was compared (though not by Thomson) to a British dessert calledplum pudding, hence the name. Thomson 's paper was published in the March 1904 edition of the Philosophical Magazine , the leading British science journal of the day. In Thomson 's view:

... the atoms of the elements consist of a number of negatively electrified corpuscles enclosed in a sphere of uniform positive electrification, ... [4]

In this model, the electrons were free to rotate within the blob or cloud of positive substance. These orbits were stabilized in the model by the fact that when an electron moved farther from the center of the positive cloud, it felt a larger net positive inward force, because there was more material of opposite charge, inside its orbit (seeGauss 's law). In Thomson 's model, electrons were free to rotate in rings which were further stabilized by interactions between the electrons, and spectra were to be accounted for by energy differences of different ring orbits. Thomson attempted to make his model account for some of the major spectral lines known for some elements, but was not notably successful at this. Still, Thomson 's model (along with a similarSaturnian ring model for atomic electrons, also put forward in 1904 byNagaokaafterJames Clerk Maxwell 'smodel of Saturn 's rings), were earlier harbingers of the later and more successful solar-system-likeBohr modelof the atom.

hope dis 1 will help !!

Posted by Kanika(student)on 3/1/12

badges

nice ans..can u explain me Bohr 's model of atom plzzz. sure thumbs up

Posted by Aadhav(student)on 3/1/12

badges

ok wait a min.

Posted by Kanika(student)on 3/1/12

badges

the planetary model of an atom depicts the atom as a nucleus surrounded by revolving electrons, kind of like the solar system.

but we know that any charged body in motion radiates energy. so technically the electrons should lose energy and eventually spiral into the nucleus.

But this does not happen.

To explain that neils bohr came up with a new model of the atom with certain conditions.

Bohrs model asserts that

* The planetary model is correct
* An electron move in discrete orbits and during this it does not radiate(lose)energy.

Posted by Kanika(student)on 3/1/12

badges

more than dis...any way thank u very much for ur ans..

Posted by Aadhav(student)on 3/1/12

badges

rutherford 's model of an atom depicts that in an atom there are electrons which revolve around the nucleus and and radiate energy so technically the electrons should lose energy and eventually spiral into the nucleus.

but this ds not happen

To explain that neils bohr came up with a new model of the atom with certain conditions.

Bohrs model asserts that:

the electrons revolve around the nucleus but only in discrete orbits

when they revolve in discrete orbit they do not lose energy

hope u hv understood frm dis 1!!

Posted by Kanika(student)on 3/1/12

badges

do u want the answer for ur project or do u want to understand the model simply!!

Posted by Kanika(student)on 3/1/12

badges

i wnt a report on it

Posted by Aadhav(student)on 3/1/12

badges

ok then i will giv u anthr ans..

Posted by Kanika(student)on 3/1/12

badges

In atomic physics , the Bohr model , introduced by Niels Bohr in 1913, depicts the atom as a small, positively charged nucleus surrounded by electrons that travel in circular orbits around the nucleus—similar in structure to the solar system , but with electrostatic forces providing attraction, rather than gravity . This was an improvement on the earlier cubic model (1902), the plum-pudding model (1904), the Saturnian model (1904), and the Rutherford model (1911). Since the Bohr model is a quantum-physics–based modification of the Rutherford model, many sources combine the two, referring to the Rutherford–Bohr model .

The model 's key success lay in explaining theRydberg formulafor the spectralemission linesof atomichydrogen. While the Rydberg formula had been known experimentally, it did not gain a theoretical underpinning until the Bohr model was introduced. Not only did the Bohr model explain the reason for the structure of the Rydberg formula, it also provided a justification for its empirical results in terms of fundamental physical constants.

The Bohr model is a primitive model of thehydrogen atom. As a theory, it can be derived as a first-order approximation of the hydrogen atom using the broader and much more accuratequantum mechanics, and thus may be considered to be anobsolete scientific theory. However, because of its simplicity, and its correct results for selected systems (see below for application), the Bohr model is still commonly taught to introduce students to quantum mechanics, before moving on to the more accurate but more complexvalence shell atom. A related model was originally proposed byArthur Erich Haasin 1910, but was rejected. The quantum theory of the period betweenPlanck 's discovery of the quantum(1900) and the advent of a full-blownquantum mechanics(1925) is often referred to as theold quantum theory.

TheRutherford–Bohr modelof thehydrogen atom( Z= 1) or a hydrogen-like ion ( Z> 1), where the negatively chargedelectronconfined to anatomic shellencircles a small, positively chargedatomic nucleusand where an electron jump between orbits is accompanied by an emitted or absorbed amount ofelectromagnetic energy(). [1] The orbits in which the electron may travel are shown as grey circles; their radius increases asn 2, wherenis theprincipal quantum number. The3 → 2transition depicted here produces the first line of theBalmer series, and for hydrogen ( Z= 1) it results in a photon ofwavelength656nm(red light).

Posted by Kanika(student)on 3/1/12

badges

thank u

Posted by Aadhav(student)on 3/1/12

badges

thomson model of an antom he best experiment in future & in past

Posted by Atifaslam(student)on 18/6/12

EXPERT ANSWER
Ask a QuestionHave a doubt? Ask our expert and get quick answers.
Show me more questions

close