"A man convicted with sexual assault of a women dressed in covered clothes is more at fault than a man convicted with that of a women dressed in seemingly "inappropriate" clothing"
Debate on the above statement.
Give points for and against.

Dear Student, 

Such questions are made for enhancing the self-creative skills and should be tried
answering on your own. However, here are a few points that will help you in framing
your answer:

For 

​​Psychologist approach

• A criminal act is not a result of a particular situation. 
• It is the creation of a demented mind. 
• Psychologists often point out criminals think differently from normal human beings. 
• There are stimulating factors which trigger their actions. 
• In the case of sexual assaults, a provocatively dressed woman stimulates criminals to behave in a certain way.   

Against

Femininst approach

• Sexual assaults are a direct result of a patriarchal society. 
• Patriarchy supports the dominance of man and subjugation of woman. 
• Therefore, subjecting a woman to sexual assault is nothing but an expression of the feeling of dominance of man.
• The attire of a woman plays no role in such acts. 

Conclusion

• Empirical evidence shows that even children suffer from sexual assaults. 
• So, one can conclude that the attire of a woman plays no role in such acts. 
• It is a product of society's patriarchal nature. 

You may feel free to contact us if you face any issue or difficulty while composing your
answer. You can also send us your answers here for a feedback and required corrections,
if any.
Regards,