do you agree that between crime and punishment it is mainly a battle of wits?

rn

es, it is a battle of wits between crime and punishment. If the government and law enforcing officials are vigilant crime can be detected and criminals can be booked. But criminals like Evans can hoodwink the authorities and escape punishment as long as the officials are slow and lack alertness and wit.

  • 6

yes, it is a battle of wits between crime and punishment. If the government and law enforcing officials are vigilant crime can be detected and criminals can be booked. But criminals like Evans can hoodwink the authorities and escape punishment as long as the officials are slow and lack alertness and wit.

  • 3
Firstly,  Battle of Wits: To defeat someone using your own intelligence, with cleverness and craftiness.

I'm just giving you two lines, it would be enough, summary you can yourself put on. Alright?

When a criminal gets punished, caught and beaten, then the police authorities will win the battle of "wits".
When a criminal is able to do crime, escape, then the criminal will win the battle of "wits".
  • 0
What are you looking for?