how were British portrait paintings different from the portrait paintings of Indian artists

Dear Student,

Please find below the solution to the asked query:

British portrait paintings were life sized which looked real. The art of oil painting gave a clear finish and the impact was good.The British art used perspective.

Indian portrait paintings were miniature paintings. Natural colours were used which did not provide the realistic impact.

Hope   this information   will clear your doubts   

If you have any more doubts just ask here on the forum and our experts   will   try to help you out as soon as possible.




  • 3
portrait paintings of british were mostly done by oil paints whereas the portrait paintings made by the Indians were made of water coloures.
  • -2
British used to made their portrait paintings by oil paints while the Indians used water paints.
  • -1
Traditional Indian portraits were very small while colonial/ British portraits were life-size images that looked real.
In the above ways Indian portraits were different from British portraits.
  • -1
1. they were realistic looking and used perspective.
2. mostly done in oil.
​1. used natural water colour.
2. didn't give much impact than British.
  • 0
What are you looking for?